NEWS21 October 2013
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
US — We’ve not been short of data recently on the percentage of consumers attempting to complete online surveys on mobile devices: GMI says 10%, Kinesis says 40%. But here’s a new figure for you: 19% of all online surveys globally are taken on a mobile device. That’s according to a new study from GreenBook.
Published over the weekend, the GreenBook Consumer Participation in Research (or CPR) report uses a pretty weighty sample to make such a claim: over 1.5m web users.
Research partner RIWI takes advantage of people’s tendency to occasionally misspell a URL when typing it in to a browser’s direct navigation bar. Instead of ending up on an error page, the user is instead presented with a series of short survey questions. At the same time, RIWI is able to collect meta-data about the devices people use when they access the survey, which is where the 19% figure comes from.
iOS was the most mobile platform in use at 33%, followed by Android at 25% and BlackBerry at 12% – although iOS is heavily overrepresented and Android underrepresented in the RIWI survey when compared to third-party data.
Meanwhile, over on desktop devices, 87% of people accessing the survey were on Windows machines, with Microsoft’s Internet Explorer the most widely used browser ( 39%), followed by Chrome ( 30%) and Firefox ( 21%).
The full report is available for download here.
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
Media evaluation firm Comscore has increased its revenue in the second quarter but has made a net loss of $44.9m, a… https://t.co/rAHZYxiapz
RT @ImpactMRS: Marginalised groups are asserting themselves in Latin America, with diverse creative energy and an embrace of indigenous cul…
There is no evidence that Facebook’s worldwide popularity is linked to widespread psychological harm, according to… https://t.co/wS1Um3JRS5
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Data Analyst – Specialist Market Research Group
To £35,000
Spalding Goobey Associates
Senior Research Executive, Automotive – Research Consultanc
£32–36,000 + benefits
Resources Group
Research Exec / Junior Consultant – Social Research and Consulting
Up to £30,000 + Benefits
Featured company
Town/Country: London
Tel: +44 (0)20 7490 7888
Kudos Research are leading providers of premium quality UK and International Telephone Data-Collection. Specialising in hard to reach B2B and Consumer audiences, we achieve excellent response rates and provide robust, actionable, verbatim-rich data. Methodologies include CATI, . . .
Anon
10 years ago
This is a gigantic claim. 1.5 million users? I doubt if it is even representative. Another example of rubbish been thrown out to the open.
Eric Meerkamper
10 years ago
Actually,1,587,281 respondents from 231 countries and regions of the world were randomly exposed to the survey, of which about 10% (160,118) gave responses. The report provides detailed statistical analysis of the limitations of both the un-weighted and weighted data as well as its representativeness for the Internet population (not general population). Please feel free to read the report and contribute your comments on the findings.
John Grono
10 years ago
I note the sample was web users. While they may have asked about other methodologies that web users have experienced, have they taken into account the people who don't have web access and therefore will have experienced F2F and CATI but not web. Verdict: Overstatement.
Eric Meerkamper
10 years ago
John, you are correct. The article above incorrectly interpreted the report findings to mean that 19% of ALL surveys globally are taken on mobile devices. As stated in the report, this study was only with people with web-enabled devices and found that 19% of these people responded using a mobile phone.
Brian Tarran
10 years ago
Hi Eric, Agree that we should have been more specific about it referring to online surveys, and have updated accordingly.
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
6 Comments
Anon
10 years ago
This is a gigantic claim. 1.5 million users? I doubt if it is even representative. Another example of rubbish been thrown out to the open.
Like Reply Report
Eric Meerkamper
10 years ago
Actually,1,587,281 respondents from 231 countries and regions of the world were randomly exposed to the survey, of which about 10% (160,118) gave responses. The report provides detailed statistical analysis of the limitations of both the un-weighted and weighted data as well as its representativeness for the Internet population (not general population). Please feel free to read the report and contribute your comments on the findings.
Like Reply Report
John Grono
10 years ago
I note the sample was web users. While they may have asked about other methodologies that web users have experienced, have they taken into account the people who don't have web access and therefore will have experienced F2F and CATI but not web. Verdict: Overstatement.
Like Reply Report
Eric Meerkamper
10 years ago
John, you are correct. The article above incorrectly interpreted the report findings to mean that 19% of ALL surveys globally are taken on mobile devices. As stated in the report, this study was only with people with web-enabled devices and found that 19% of these people responded using a mobile phone.
Like Reply Report
Brian Tarran
10 years ago
Hi Eric, Agree that we should have been more specific about it referring to online surveys, and have updated accordingly.
Like Reply Report
Ray Poynter
10 years ago
Hi Eric Does the 19% relate to the 10% who answered the survey, or the 100% who saw the invitation? Both are interesting, but the implications are different.
Like Reply Report