This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

OPINION2 April 2012

Racism and ‘bomb hoax’ tweets: reigniting the social media research debate

Opinion

Andy Evans asks: if the courts consider tweets to be public domain, why can’t the research community?

Liam Stacey was jailed last week for 56 days for tweeting racially offensive remarks about the Bolton Wanderers footballer Fabrice Muamba, who had suffered a heart attack on the pitch.

Previously, accountant Paul Chambers was convicted of sending “a message of a menacing character” contrary to the 2003 Communications Act, for tweeting: “Robin Hood Airport is closed. You’ve got a week and a bit… otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high!”

The lessons from both cases: if you post on the web, you must realise you are publishing and be very sure about who you are publishing to. Both men were tweeting publicly, therefore publishing to everyone who uses the web. Neither was sharing their thoughts privately and must stand by the consequences.

All of which runs contrary to the recent Market Research Society guidelines for online research. These say that you cannot, for research purposes, use information posted online that was not explicitly posted as part of a research study. Data acquired by searching the web cannot be used, because it is not acquired by the guiding principle of informed voluntary consent. This position not only ignores the burgeoning social media monitoring industry, whose sole purpose is to trawl the web collecting data for research and interactive marketing purposes; it also ignores the purpose of the web, that it is a vehicle for publishing information.

If you publish an article in a journal or get quoted in a newspaper story, you tacitly acknowledge that others have the right to search, analyse, re-quote (accurately) and attribute what you have said. It is sloppy work not to reference sources in desk research. Putting information online should be guided by exactly the same principle.

Moral and ethical judgement and common sense need to be applied, of course. But if the law courts consider tweets to be public domain, shouldn’t the research community?

Andy Evans is co-founder of Humfish, a software developer building research web applications, and ethnographer and research filmmaker at Exposure Research

@RESEARCH LIVE

0 Comments