Racism and ‘bomb hoax’ tweets: reigniting the social media research debate

Andy Evans asks: if the courts consider tweets to be public domain, why can’t the research community?

Liam Stacey was jailed last week for 56 days for tweeting racially offensive remarks about the Bolton Wanderers footballer Fabrice Muamba, who had suffered a heart attack on the pitch.

Previously, accountant Paul Chambers was convicted of sending “a message of a menacing character” contrary to the 2003 Communications Act, for tweeting: “Robin Hood Airport is closed. You’ve got a week and a bit… otherwise I’m blowing the airport sky high!”

The lessons from both cases: if you post on the web, you must realise you are publishing and be very sure about who you are publishing to. Both men were tweeting publicly, therefore publishing to everyone who uses the web. Neither was sharing their thoughts privately and must stand by the consequences.

All of which runs contrary to the recent Market Research Society guidelines for online research. These say that you cannot, for research purposes, use information posted online that was not explicitly posted as part of a research study. Data acquired by searching the web cannot be used, because it is not acquired by the guiding principle of informed voluntary consent. This position not only ignores the burgeoning social media monitoring industry, whose sole purpose is to trawl the web collecting data for research and interactive marketing purposes; it also ignores the purpose of the web, that it is a vehicle for publishing information.

If you publish an article in a journal or get quoted in a newspaper story, you tacitly acknowledge that others have the right to search, analyse, re-quote (accurately) and attribute what you have said. It is sloppy work not to reference sources in desk research. Putting information online should be guided by exactly the same principle.

Moral and ethical judgement and common sense need to be applied, of course. But if the law courts consider tweets to be public domain, shouldn’t the research community?

Andy Evans is co-founder of Humfish, a software developer building research web applications, and ethnographer and research filmmaker at Exposure Research

We hope you enjoyed this article.
Research Live is published by MRS.

The Market Research Society (MRS) exists to promote and protect the research sector, showcasing how research delivers impact for businesses and government.

Members of MRS enjoy many benefits including tailoured policy guidance, discounts on training and conferences, and access to member-only content.

For example, there's an archive of winning case studies from over a decade of MRS Awards.

Find out more about the benefits of joining MRS here.

0 Comments


Display name

Email

Join the discussion

Newsletter
Stay connected with the latest insights and trends...
Sign Up
Latest From MRS

Our latest training courses

Our new 2025 training programme is now launched as part of the development offered within the MRS Global Insight Academy

See all training

Specialist conferences

Our one-day conferences cover topics including CX and UX, Semiotics, B2B, Finance, AI and Leaders' Forums.

See all conferences

MRS reports on AI

MRS has published a three-part series on how generative AI is impacting the research sector, including synthetic respondents and challenges to adoption.

See the reports

Progress faster...
with MRS 
membership

Mentoring

CPD/recognition

Webinars

Codeline

Discounts