OPINION15 April 2016
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
OPINION15 April 2016
The subconscious strongly influences purchasing decisions, yet traditional emotion-based market research techniques are qualitative and although informative, their scope is too limited to strongly inform marketing strategies says Nelson Tao.
Pairing my experience in both research on the advertising agency side and marketing sciences at eHarmony, I hypothesised there is an opportunity to build a quantifiable, emotion-based research method by applying human relationship and compatibility-matching concepts to data science practices.
To explore this, my team compared and analysed human-to-human and consumer-to-brand relationships. The first step was to apply three core elements of human relationships, including what we’ve labelled as chemistry, needs-fulfilment and compatibility, to consumer to brand relationships. The parallels of these components in both human and brand relationships established the foundation for a quantitative methodology.
To validate our hypothesis that love between a consumer and brand mirrors that of between two people we conducted a large-scale study that tested if ‘love’ construct could predict actual consumer behaviours. In a quantitative study with more than 6,000 respondents, tracking over 250 brands across 25 industries, we saw that this model could predict consumer behaviours with a R-squared value > 0.70. The model, rooted in human relationship concepts, shows how consumer love for a brand influences their purchase behaviour, brand loyalty, brand engagement, word-of-mouth, and so much more.
While recognising that measuring and understanding consumer love for a brand can provide reliable and valuable insights for predicting consumer behaviours, we still faced the problem that quantitative research tools tend to capture rational data.
To overcome this, we developed specially designed exercises that use interactive and continuous relational scales (as opposed to 5 point scales) to measure emotional concepts.
For example, instead of asking a respondent to rate how much they love a brand on a standard scale, respondents drag different brand logos closer to or farther away from a heart to illustrate the closeness of their relationship with the brand.
In addition, since consumers are challenged to articulate the role that emotions play in their decision making, often because those emotions are latent, we can use algorithmic solutions. Advanced machine learning algorithms can model what drives observed consumer behaviours instead of asking consumers to explain their thought processes explicitly. As a result, our understanding is based on what consumers actually do rather than what they say they do.
This approach to quantitative emotion-based research looks beyond how much consumers love a brand and can be used to predict desired business outcomes.
This methodology can help achieve a host of objectives, from higher brand consideration among high value customers in the banking category, to increased ratings in reality TV in the cable world, to retention of market share among Hispanic consumers in the oral care category.
After decades of talking about the power of emotional research, I believe our industry is entering an exciting chapter with some game-changing approaches to allow marketers to tap into its full potential.
Nelson Tao is senior vice-president marketing sciences at Coherency
0 Comments