FTO seeks ‘openness’ in offshore MR practices
The Foundation for Transparency in Offshoring (FTO) calls it the industry’s “dirty little secret”. FTO founder and chairman Tom Anderson (pictured) – owner of Anderson Analytics – says research data from a survey of 850 research buyers and suppliers demonstrates there is “a transparency gap” with fewer clients than suppliers stating that research projects are offshored.
“In most cases,” he says, “research buyers don’t even know that their projects are being offshored.”
In a bid to remedy this, the FTO has established a self-certification scheme for agencies to make a record of whether they use offshore suppliers, which parts of their projects they offshore and to what countries they outsource to.
FTO advisory board member Sonia Baldia, a partner at law firm Mayer Brown said: “Clients absolutely need to know about any offshore subcontracting and the location in order to gauge risks and protect themselves. Many offshoring destinations do not have well-developed intellectual property laws and data protection laws.”
Do you support the aims of the FTO? Let us know your thoughts below. Are research agencies too secretive in their use of offshoring, or are most suppliers honest and open about the practice?
We hope you enjoyed this article.
Research Live is published by MRS.
The Market Research Society (MRS) exists to promote and protect the research sector, showcasing how research delivers impact for businesses and government.
Members of MRS enjoy many benefits including tailoured policy guidance, discounts on training and conferences, and access to member-only content.
For example, there's an archive of winning case studies from over a decade of MRS Awards.
Find out more about the benefits of joining MRS here.
2 Comments
Ray Poynter
16 years ago
More transparency is always good! However, one of the two logos that the FTO provide is for companies claiming never to offshore. I suspect that in the EU this would not be legal in terms of European restraint of trade legislsation. I would also suggest that it would be at the very least amoral for any company who sold services internationally to adopt a protectionist policy about not buying from abroad. I also wish that the FTO had made its target transparency about outsourcing AND offshoring, as both should be disclosed, and by focusing on just offshoring the FTO is going to attract the wrong sort of attention.
Like Reply Report
Daniel
16 years ago
Hi Ray-agree to your comments above. I actually opened a discussion thread in LinkedIn at this adress http://bit.ly/6cWwIv, where I state my view about this initiative. All the best, Dan
Like Reply Report