NEWS21 June 2010
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
US— The Food and Drug Administration has ordered tobacco firm Philip Morris to hand over all market research relating to the rebranding of its Marlboro Lights cigarettes as ‘Marlboro Gold’.
The firm advertised the name change by adding ‘onserts’ to packets of Marlboro Lights telling customers that “Your Marlboro Lights pack is changing, but your cigarette stays the same”, ahead of changes in US law that prohibit the use of the words ‘light’, ‘mild’ or ‘low’ in tobacco products.
However, the FDA felt there was a danger that customers might think they were still smoking a lighter, and therefore less dangerous, brand once the name change came into effect and decided to look into what consumers make of the change.
In a letter to Philip Morris the FDA demanded “all documents referring to or relating to marketing research, regardless of whether qualitative, empirical, or otherwise” that contain consumers’ perceptions, beliefs, concerns, thoughts and impressions about the Marlboro Lights brand.
The FDA said it is “concerned that the statements included in the onserts attached to the individual packs of Marlboro Lights may perpetuate the mistaken beliefs associated with ‘light’ cigarettes when marketed as Marlboro in the gold pack”.
“By stating that only the packaging is changing, but the cigarettes will stay the same, the onsert suggests that Marlboro in the gold pack will have the same characteristics as Marlboro Lights, including any mistaken attributes associated with the ‘light’ cigarettes,” the FDA said.
Philip Morris has been given a deadline of the end of July to submit its research.
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
In a new series exploring how research leaders manage work and life, Research Live hears from Guy Goodwin, chief ex… https://t.co/zuqLKnAyJ3
With the beginning of a new year, it is time to dust off the reading list. Marie Hense of @TolunaCorporate recommen… https://t.co/Nbb8PUbqtj
Ipsos India reshuffles marketing and operations teams https://t.co/hgscr5zKWv #mrx #marketresearch
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Senior Research Executive – Gaming & Tech – Boutique Agency
£30,000–£35,000 + great benefits
Guide Dogs for the Blind
Insight Officer
£28,988.00–£35,199.99 subject to experience
Hasson Associates
DP Analyst
£30000–38000
salamander
13 years ago
The FDA is a worthless organization. Instead of wasting time and taypayer money, why don't they try following federal guidelines and tell people about the health benefits of vitamins and supplements? But no, they break those laws and waste time with this. Smoking is bad for you but its a a smokers choice, not the FDA or government. Give me a break.
Tillster makes her feelings known over my exercise routine taking priority over games with her https://t.co/AbB9aCnq31
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
1 Comment
salamander
13 years ago
The FDA is a worthless organization. Instead of wasting time and taypayer money, why don't they try following federal guidelines and tell people about the health benefits of vitamins and supplements? But no, they break those laws and waste time with this. Smoking is bad for you but its a a smokers choice, not the FDA or government. Give me a break.
Like Reply Report