NEWS25 June 2012
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
NEWS25 June 2012
CANADA— The Canadian Government has opted to analyse some survey results in-house in order to save money, reports suggest.
According to a report in The Ottawa Citizen, the federal government has begun to analyse some of the public opinion surveys it commissions rather than use the impartial analysis of the polling companies themselves – four out of 20 studies have been analysed in-house in the last six months. The newspaper claims that the result is that some findings have become less transparent.
A government spokesperson is quoted as saying the shift to internal analysis is “one way departments are doing their part to help reduce overall costs for taxpayers”.
“This practice not only saves analysis and reporting costs, but also permits tracking and comparison of results over time,” the spokesman said. “Choosing to conduct analysis in-house or externally will vary depending upon the project, budget and capacity.”
The move follows criticism of massive government cuts in spending on public opinion research which have left policy-makers and civil servants with less evidence to work with.
Newsletter
Sign up for the latest news and opinion.
You will be asked to create an account which also gives you free access to premium Impact content.
Media evaluation firm Comscore has increased its revenue in the second quarter but has made a net loss of $44.9m, a… https://t.co/rAHZYxiapz
RT @ImpactMRS: Marginalised groups are asserting themselves in Latin America, with diverse creative energy and an embrace of indigenous cul…
There is no evidence that Facebook’s worldwide popularity is linked to widespread psychological harm, according to… https://t.co/wS1Um3JRS5
Related Articles
The world's leading job site for research and insight
Resources Group
Research Exec / Junior Consultant – Social Research and Consulting
Up to £30,000 + Benefits
Spalding Goobey Associates
Associate Director – Quantitative Research – Make an impact in this fast growing team
£45,000 – 55,000 + bens
Resources Group
Research Manager – Clientside Charity Sector
£38–40,000 + 30 days holiday + good benefits
Doris Hamilton
11 years ago
WTH?! It is not immediately apparent how disregarding impartial analysis by highly experienced professionals is an improvement. Market researchers should be concerned. Still, if resources from Statistics Canada are brought into play,this may work. Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists will go nuts!
Anon
11 years ago
Speaking as the Research Manager of a large UK retailer, this move by the Canadian Government could be significant forward thinking. Impartiality issues aside (we don't have the same level of challenge in this area), I’m frequently finding the value that we receive from agency analysis and the insight they apply simply doesn’t pay for itself. I’m yet to work with an agency which can truly deliver on its promise of actionable insight – with tracking studies as the worst offenders. I can see this as an expanding area of experimentation for clients on the future.
The post-demographic consumerism trend means segments such age are often outdated, from @trendwatching #TrendSemLON
2 Comments
Doris Hamilton
11 years ago
WTH?! It is not immediately apparent how disregarding impartial analysis by highly experienced professionals is an improvement. Market researchers should be concerned. Still, if resources from Statistics Canada are brought into play,this may work. Meanwhile, conspiracy theorists will go nuts!
Like Reply Report
Anon
11 years ago
Speaking as the Research Manager of a large UK retailer, this move by the Canadian Government could be significant forward thinking. Impartiality issues aside (we don't have the same level of challenge in this area), I’m frequently finding the value that we receive from agency analysis and the insight they apply simply doesn’t pay for itself. I’m yet to work with an agency which can truly deliver on its promise of actionable insight – with tracking studies as the worst offenders. I can see this as an expanding area of experimentation for clients on the future.
Like Reply Report