FEATURE2 October 2012
All MRS websites use cookies to help us improve our services. Any data collected is anonymised. If you continue using this site without accepting cookies you may experience some performance issues. Read about our cookies here.
FEATURE2 October 2012
The research industry needs to muscle in on big data, says Colin Strong. It’s too important to leave to the mathematicians and computer scientists.
Big data is a powerful tool to advance our knowledge of consumer behaviour. But contrary to what some would have you believe, it isn’t a universal panacea to the challenges businesses face understanding their customers.
Also, don’t let the size thing fool you. Data is only useful if used in a smart way, so if you are looking to get the most out of your data assets – however big they might be – you need to combine behavioural information with consumer survey data, and a social science perspective.
I call it “smart data”, and here’s why researchers need to be setting the smart data agenda.
McKinsey estimates that in the US alone there is a shortfall of 190,000 analytics experts and 1.5 million data-savvy managers with the necessary skills to make decisions based on the analysis of big data.
But the skills associated with market research are very much in the right category: an ability to understand and manipulate large data sets, good analytical skills, an ability to interpret findings and apply them to business.
Indeed, some research agencies are now in a position where they are handling big data every day as the level of digital data being captured proliferates and agencies start aggregating this information.
The need to understand the context and meaning of the behaviour that is observed in big datasets will rapidly become critical as there is only so much nuance that a purely behavioural analysis will provide. The consumer intention that is driving activity can only be properly understood by talking to the consumer. This is an opportunity for a wide range of thinkers and practitioners – from ethnographers and qualitative researchers through to marketing scientists and quantitative analysts.
Without understanding the consumer mindset there is a danger that big data never becomes smart data. As such, the value for marketers is limited. Intelligent integration brings consumer and research knowledge together with big data to avoid the risk of chasing the wrong questions and finding false positives. Appreciation of underlying assumptions within the data, and of the motivations behind consumer actions are likely to improve the way findings are understood and communicated.
The starting point for big data has often been for brands to analyse their own proprietary datasets, generated from their own digital assets, and then to use this information to optimise consumer interaction with their brand.
However, walled-garden approaches like this only give part of the story. They tell you nothing about the activity that led the consumer to encounter the brand in the first place – nor, indeed, which other brands that consumer is having conversations with.
Research agencies are in a strong position to “own” the smart data approach for a number of reasons:
Together these provide the opportunity for a much wider understanding of a brand’s performance and can be used to place the work done on the brands’ own data assets in a much wider context.
The era of big data allows us to start exploring human behaviour, and specifically human social interaction, in a way that has never before been possible. The tools we use always shape our understanding, so if our tools suddenly grow and change then so will our understanding – and not just in size and scale but qualitatively.
Perhaps this is the real heart of smart data, where our understanding of consumers is embodied within the data itself, generating insights into the human condition that are hard to derive by other means. Creating this type of understanding will make a huge difference to the way brands use their datasets as they start to properly integrate models of human and social behaviour.
The challenge for our industry is making the case for smart data – rather than just big data – as the most profitable way for brands to unlock the value held in their data assets.
Colin Strong is managing director of GfK’s technology division in the UK
2 Comments
Anon
12 years ago
Colin - i think you are spot on on your analysis of our potential to 'own' this spot but I think that you miss a significant hurdle and that's the good old client. In big data organisations the data is increasingly owned by the Business Intelligence/Analytics/Insight functions (And in these companies Insight doesn't always equal MR). Research in these companies tends to report into or is removed from or subsurvient to the big data controller. So we are back to the perrenial problem of gettimg our very valid case past the clientside research gatekeeper and in front of the right and senior enough person...not often easy.
Like Reply Report
colinstrong
12 years ago
Hi, thanks for your comment. I thoroughly agree that there are real hurdles to making this happen. My concern at the moment is that we are simply not making a strong enough case to muscle in on the party. So yes, you are right to highlight that even if we make this case there is still a lot of work to be done to negotiate access.
Like Reply Report