Yesterday’s New Product Development conference (organised by Research Conferences — Ed.) was a good event with a nice mix of agency and client side researchers and NPD specialists. I ended up on a panel with Esther Garland from Face and Marilena D’Amone from Reckitt Benckiser discussing the merits or otherwise of co-creation.
One of the issues discussed was whether co-creation is a buzzword or something more tangible. The truth is, it’s a bit of both.
If fully embraced by a company it should end up as a philosophy that pervades the organisation and means that customers are bought in (both literally and metaphorically) to the organisation and its decision making processes. For instance, we recently did a proposal for a company to set up consumer connect sessions with board of directors – that really is bringing the customer inside the business.
Of course, there is the danger that co-creation gets treated simply as another tickbox on the research methodology page, and all we do is ask people for their ideas a little more openly than we normally would in a typical focus group.
The feeling from conference delegates, however, was that the former was winning out.
Steve Phillips
Steve is the Chief Happiness Officer of Spring Research. His work focuses on understanding consumer motivation and behaviour and he was instrumental in developing the Snakes & Ladders approach to exploring the purchase journey. This work won the ‘Best New Thinking’ award at the MRS Conference and also led to Spring winning the industries Innovation award. As part of the 38th Floor Group, Steve is also a partner in both MESH Planning and Tuned In Research.Recent Posts
-
Real research
9-May-2012
-
Research in the year 2020
7-Feb-2012
-
Gamification or funification?
13-Oct-2011
-
No silver bullet
29-Jun-2011
-
Partnership over competition, the future?
18-May-2011
-
Misbehavioural economics
19-Apr-2011

