In a letter to the Daily Telegraph, former Tory MP Edwina Currie suggests that the most cost-efficient way of gauging the effectiveness of public service advertising might be to stop doing any.
“Exhortations to stop smoking, seek help for cocaine sniffing, enter further education, avoid drink-driving, join the Armed Forces, and take a chlamydia test are doubtless worthy,” she writes. “But seeing them all at once, any intelligent viewer is bound to wonder whether the Government is trying to keep the advertising industry in business all by itself.”
Her suggestion is to scrap the COI’s £540m budget and see what difference it makes. And with post-election spending cuts looming, that prospect seems less unrealistic than it might once have done.
Robert Bain
I look after the features content for Research-live.com and Research Magazine, and contribute to the blogs.
Brian Tarran
I am the editor of Research-Live.com and Research Magazine.
James Verrinder
I work on the newsdesk for Research Magazine and www.research-live.comRecent Posts
-
Digging deep to win
10-Feb-2012
-
Jana’s Eagle one of '50 people who will change the world'
1-Feb-2012
-
Is Amazon on the verge of offering analytics?
5-Jan-2012
-
When reputation management goes wrong
8-Dec-2011
-
Ad spend forecasts are going down, down, down
6-Dec-2011
-
A shower-fresh approach to monitoring behaviour
23-Nov-2011

