This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more here

Wednesday, 23 July 2014

Citizenship Survey axed to save £4m despite opposition

UK— The Department of Communities and Local Government (CLG) is pressing ahead with cancellation of the Citizenship Survey in spite of opposition to the plans from other government departments, voluntary organisations and academics.

Opponents of the move, among them the National Statistician Jil Matheson, fear that the loss of the survey will set back work in areas such as equality measurement, measuring wellbeing and the pursuit of the ‘Big Society’. There have been complaints that it would remove a key source of information on perceptions of public services,with the Place Survey having already been axed.

But CLG said: “As part of the current drive to deliver cost savings across government and to reduce the fiscal deficit, research budgets are being closely scrutinised to identify where savings can be made. In this climate, the department has therefore concluded that, going forward, the Citizenship Survey results are not of sufficient importance to users to allow the survey to continue.”

CLG lost 40% of its administration budget in the government’s spending review. The annual cost of the Citizenship Survey, run by Ipsos Mori and TNS BMRB, is £4m.

The survey was established in 2001, initially running every two years but moving on to a continuous design in 2007. It involved face-to-face interviews with 10,000 adults in England and Wales, plus an ethnic minority boost sample of 5,000 and a Muslim boost sample of 1,200.

Issues covered by the survey include respondents’ views about the local area, community cohesion, racial and religious prejudice and discrimination, identity, values, civic engagement and volunteering and charitable giving.

CLG said that in the absence of the Citizenship Survey it would expect “other providers who have a priority need for data of this type to take steps to provide it themselves, in the academic or external market”.

Follow us on
Follow us on Twitter

Readers' comments (2)

  • Its an easy target. Have to wonder how wise it is though. Its not like the rest of the economy where there are thousands of indicators of how the market is performing, or how well the demand is being met. How's the CLG is going to understand its audience? If it wants to save money how will it know where its money is best spent? And given the importance of long term tracking, the gaps in knowledge that this will leave is indeed worrying.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • A degree of cynacism suggests that we might ponder politically expedient motivations behind the removal of overviews such as such, the loss of the Place Survey and the demise of the Audit Commission: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/joepublic/2010/aug/17/who-replace-axed-audit-commission

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

Please add your comment. You can include links, but HTML is not permitted.
Your email address will not be displayed on the site. All comments are moderated.

Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory
Mandatory